TERMINOLOGY CLARIFICATIONS



Restoration Objectives or Motives:
There are many factors that drive river restoration projects and eventually are formalized as restoration objectives. Objectives are typically formulated in response to identified problems.
Aesthetic:
A restoration projects intended to improve the visual appeal of the landscape.
Flood Control:
Flood control or defense is a very common objective of river management. In the context of river restoration, peak flood stages are to be minimized and flood waves attenuated. Flood control objectives are typically sought along urban or agricultural corridors, where economic impacts of floods are quite high. river corridors.
General Ecosystem Habitat:
Projects intended to provide improved quality and/or increased quantity of physical habitat for a variety of species at different lifestages. Ecosystem habitat objectives often emphasize the importance of biodiversity and hence a heterogeneity of habitats.
Habitat for a Single or Specific Target Species:
Projects intended to provide improved quality and/or increased quantity of physical habitat for a single or few species, perhaps at specific lifestages. Target species are typically identified for which habitat is limiting.
Mitigation for Other Impacts:
Mitigation projects often arise from regulatory requirements that are intended to offset known impacts. The two most common examples are new developments and point source pollution outlets. In the case of new developments, a portion of the river system may be directly modified or removed; and mitigation would somehow compensate for the loss or impact. In the case of pollution outlets, known discharges of hazardous materials have to be accounted for.
Property or Structural Protection:
This is a very common objective of river management activities that involves the “repair ” and/or “improvement” of a river to protect man-made structures (e.g. bridge footings, walls, fences, roads, buildings) and/or property (i.e. actively eroding river bank).
Sediment Management:
Any river which is actively managed to account for perceived imbalances in the sediment budget may fall under this heading. Common examples include a) erosion control management practices applied throughout the basin to account for excessive fine-grained sediment loads; b) gravel traps and or grade control structures to account for excessive coarse-grained sediment loads.
Water Quality:
The improvement of water quality can mean either treatment (e.g. constructed wetlands, treatment plant) or through the elmination of pollution sources (either "point" or "non-ponint" sources of pollution).
Reference(s):
If you have further questions or concerns email me, and I will try to provide a clarification.
Or, if you would like general information about this survey and its purpose, click here.

The survey was designed for use in Netscape 7 or later, and Internet Explore 6 or later. The survey is known to have some problems in older browsers. If you experience difficulties, you may download Netscape 7.1 for free here.
Last updated by Joe Wheaton ©2004 on: 5 April, 2004 13:29